Friday, February 20, 2015

Journal Article Review #3

Citation:

Heitin, Liana. For teachers, wired classrooms pose new management concerns.  Education Week [Online].  October 14, 2013. <www.edweek.org/tm/articles/2013/10/14/cm_wired.html>.

REVIEW OF FOR TEACHERS, WIRED CLASSROOMS POSE NEW MANAGEMENT CONCERNS

Summary:

The use of technology within classrooms across the United States is on the rise.  As more and more schools incorporate 1-to-1 personal computing devices, demands regarding their management are causing increased concern.  Liana Heitin addresses this challenge in her article For Teachers, Wired Classrooms Pose New Management Concerns (2013).  Heitin argues that management of 1-to-1 classrooms comes down to three key issues:  1) how to keep kids on task, 2) how to ensure that devices are safe and properly maintained, and 3) how to compete with the tech-savvy students (2013).  The author then goes on to address each issue by offering ways to combat each issue.  


Recommendations:

To keep kids on task, it is suggested to either circulate or, if a teacher is fortunate enough to have it, to use remote desktop monitoring software to see what each student is doing on his or her screen and ensure that they remain on task (Heitin 2013).  To ensure the safety and proper maintenance of devices, Heitin states, “One of the best ways to keep devices in good condition is by creating a sense of value around them” (2013).  After all, if students appreciate having the privilege of using such devices, and if they understand how expensive they are to replace (a cost that will almost certainly need to be covered by them or their parents), then the idea is that the will take better care of those devices.  Heitin goes on to explain several examples of how schools protect devices, including keeping them at school, using a numbering system, and employing technology monitors (2013).  Finally, device security is addressed by the author.  It is suggested to employ the use of firewalls, passwords, and cloud sharing tools to ensure that student devices and their contents are appropriate and secure (Heitin 2013).  An example is even given where a district had a student who kept hacking passwords and bypassing firewalls but was given a summer job of exposing all of the district’s technological weaknesses so that they could be fixed (Heitin 2013).


Reflection/Application:

I think that this article contains some pretty decent ideas on how to manage a technology-infused classroom.  For starters, firewalls can be a great way to prevent students from accessing inappropriate websites while they are at school and connected to the school’s Internet.  The downside to them is that no matter how you limit access, students always find a way to access the content that is being blocked; it is as simple as pulling their smartphones out, connecting to their mobile network, and going to whatever websites they want to.  In addition to firewalls, remote monitoring software is a great tool that can be used to monitor students as they work on their computers in class.  It can be used to check progress, monitor time on task, and so forth.   I have used Faronics, a remote monitoring tool, successfully in the classroom on numerous occasions.  Moreover, sharing tools like Dropbox and Google Drive are great for sharing things back and forth with multiple people on multiple devices.  We regularly use Google Drive at our school.  Students love the fact that they can type an essay in school, have it automatically save their progress, and then go home and pick up writing right where they left off at school.  And, as a teacher, I love the fact that my students can submit, or “share”, their documents with me and I do not have to carry a large stack of essays around to grade.

Of all of Heitin’s suggestions, however, the one that intrigues me the most is hiring tech-savvy students to expose cracks in a school’s digital system.  I am leery of this idea because there are plenty of competent professionals that could do this for a school without exposing sensitive data to a student just to figure out where system cracks are.  I do not feel that doing such a thing is very professional or ethical.  In any case, the suggestions made by this article are a decent “jumping off” point for any digital classroom.



Tuesday, February 10, 2015

Journal Study Review #2

Dan Solecki
EDU 6210
Journal Entry #2

Citation:

Wood, C.; Jackson, E.; Hart, L.; Plester, B.; L.Wilde. The effect of text messaging on 9- and 10-year-old children's reading, spelling, and phonological processing skills.  Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. Feb2011, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p28-36. Retrieved from EBSCO Host Database: Professional Development Collection.  DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00398.x.


REVIEW OF THE EFFECT OF TEXT MESSAGING ON 9- AND 10-YEAR-OLD CHILDREN’S READING, SPELLING AND PHONOLOGICAL PROCESSING SKILLS

Summary:

The purpose of this study was to see if text messaging by children had a positive or a negative influence on their literacy skills.  The study begins by citing a previous study in the United Kingdom that determined that the use of text messaging abbreviations actually led to positive performance on reading and spelling standardized tests by preteens (Plester et al 2008).  An additional study performed in 2009 suggested that the use of text messaging language, in this case when used on a mobile device, was able to “account for a significant variance in reading ability” (Plester et al 2009).  Wood, Jackson, Hart, Plester, and Wilde choose to perform an additional study in order to confirm or disprove the 2008 Plester study. 

The research group studied 114 children in the United Kingdom between the ages of nine and ten years old who did not already own a cell phone.  Participants were split into two groups:  a control group who did not receive phones and an experiment group who received mobile phones.  All participants had to take several assessments to measure their literacy abilities.  Then, students in the experiment group were given mobile phones and asked to text regularly every weekend for ten weeks.  At the end of each weekend, phones were collected, text messages were logged and examined, and all participants were assessed again (though on a smaller scale, the study points out).  At the end of the ten weeks, participants were given the same assessments that they were given at the beginning of the study in order to measure any growth or regression of literacy skills.

Results of the study conflicted with Plester’s previous studies.  Based on the results, it was shown that children who have access to mobile phones for text messaging do not have a significant advantage over those who do not such devices (Wood 2011).  It was, however, proven through the study that “textism use during texting was linked to spelling development, and the number of messages sent and received was linked to lexical retrieval skills” (Wood 2011). 

Reflection/Application:

This study has some pretty big implications for education.  The results should encourage educators to seek out technology, such as laptops, tablets, or even mobile devices, and use it regularly in the classroom regardless of students’ age levels.   The findings of the study support the claim that utilizing such forms of technology regularly with a focus on reading and writing can have a positive effect on students’ literacy skills (Wood 2011).  If I were a teacher of anything related to literacy, I would strongly consider seeking out such tools and incorporating them into my curriculum.   


Personally, I found the results of this study very surprising.  As an educator, I have seen literacy skills, such as spelling and grammar, deteriorate dramatically over the past eight years.  I believe that is a direct result of things such as texting, autoword, autocorrect, and spellcheck.  People simply to not bother to review anything they type or write in order to catch and fix mistakes because they are used to the software or app they are using doing it automatically for them.  I have seen some absolutely atrocious spelling and grammar that I firmly believe would be much better if it was not for society’s reliance on the aforementioned “convenience” programs that automatically correct our mistakes.  I also think the study fell short by only exposing those studied to texting on the weekends.  I feel that a longer, more in-depth study which allows participants to text on the mobile phones daily for a much longer span of time, like over several years, would show that text messaging actually negatively impacts adolescents’ literacy skills.