Dan Solecki
EDU 6210
Journal Entry #2
Citation:
Wood, C.; Jackson, E.; Hart, L.; Plester, B.; L.Wilde. The effect of text messaging on 9- and 10-year-old children's reading, spelling, and phonological processing skills. Journal of
Computer Assisted Learning. Feb2011, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p28-36. Retrieved
from EBSCO Host Database: Professional Development Collection. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00398.x.
REVIEW OF THE EFFECT OF TEXT MESSAGING ON 9- AND
10-YEAR-OLD CHILDREN’S READING, SPELLING AND PHONOLOGICAL PROCESSING SKILLS
Summary:
The purpose of this study was to see if text messaging by
children had a positive or a negative influence on their literacy skills. The study begins by citing a previous study
in the United Kingdom that determined that the use of text messaging
abbreviations actually led to positive performance on reading and spelling
standardized tests by preteens (Plester et
al 2008). An additional study
performed in 2009 suggested that the use of text messaging language, in this
case when used on a mobile device, was able to “account for a significant
variance in reading ability” (Plester et
al 2009). Wood, Jackson, Hart,
Plester, and Wilde choose to perform an additional study in order to confirm or
disprove the 2008 Plester study.
The research group studied 114 children in the United
Kingdom between the ages of nine and ten years old who did not already own a
cell phone. Participants were split into
two groups: a control group who did not
receive phones and an experiment group who received mobile phones. All participants had to take several
assessments to measure their literacy abilities. Then, students in the experiment group were
given mobile phones and asked to text regularly every weekend for ten
weeks. At the end of each weekend,
phones were collected, text messages were logged and examined, and all
participants were assessed again (though on a smaller scale, the study points
out). At the end of the ten weeks,
participants were given the same assessments that they were given at the
beginning of the study in order to measure any growth or regression of literacy
skills.
Results of the study conflicted with Plester’s previous
studies. Based on the results, it was
shown that children who have access to mobile phones for text messaging do not
have a significant advantage over those who do not such devices (Wood
2011). It was, however, proven through
the study that “textism use during texting was linked to spelling development,
and the number of messages sent and received was linked to lexical retrieval
skills” (Wood 2011).
Reflection/Application:
This study has some pretty big implications for
education. The results should encourage
educators to seek out technology, such as laptops, tablets, or even mobile
devices, and use it regularly in the classroom regardless of students’ age
levels. The findings of the study support
the claim that utilizing such forms of technology regularly with a focus on
reading and writing can have a positive effect on students’ literacy skills
(Wood 2011). If I were a teacher of
anything related to literacy, I would strongly consider seeking out such tools
and incorporating them into my curriculum.
Personally, I found the results of this study very
surprising. As an educator, I have seen
literacy skills, such as spelling and grammar, deteriorate dramatically over
the past eight years. I believe that is a
direct result of things such as texting, autoword, autocorrect, and
spellcheck. People simply to not bother
to review anything they type or write in order to catch and fix mistakes
because they are used to the software or app they are using doing it automatically
for them. I have seen some absolutely
atrocious spelling and grammar that I firmly believe would be much better if it
was not for society’s reliance on the aforementioned “convenience” programs
that automatically correct our mistakes.
I also think the study fell short by only exposing those studied to
texting on the weekends. I feel that a
longer, more in-depth study which allows participants to text on the mobile
phones daily for a much longer span of time, like over several years, would
show that text messaging actually negatively impacts adolescents’ literacy
skills.
No comments:
Post a Comment